Sample SCATT report · Standing · 200 yd
Two steps up, and a long flat stretch before each one
A service-rifle shooter · 236 SCATT standing sessions · 4,708 record shots · March 2025 – October 2026 · shared anonymously
This shooter's standing didn't climb in a smooth line. It went up in two steps, with long plateaus in between where the average barely moved and single sessions swung by a point or more per shot. Those plateaus weren't wasted. The SCATT history shows the bad days getting better before the average did.
Steps: 8.36 points per shot for 7½ months, then 8.95, then 9.23.
Waves: within each plateau, sessions ranged widely, and the range narrowed each time.
The floor: the worst session went from 6.7 to 8.1 to 8.7. By the end, a bad day scored better than an average day in the first plateau.
Steps, not a slope
Each dot is one session's points per shot. The line is the running median of 15 sessions. The shaded bands are the three levels.
- First plateau, July 2025 – February 2026: 64 sessions over 7½ months. The average stayed at 8.36, and single sessions ran anywhere from 6.7 to 9.2. On the score alone, this looks like no progress at all.
- First step, March 2026: up to about 9.0 within a few weeks. It came when the shooter changed to a scope with a larger reticle, and started taking the rifle down 2–3 times per 10 shots instead of almost never.
- Second plateau, March – July 2026: 56 sessions at 8.95, flat again for five months.
- Second step, August 2026: up to 9.23, with no equipment change. It came as practice picked up, to 22 and 35 sessions a month in August and September, against 4–8 a month earlier in the summer.
Waves inside each plateau
The average only tells part of the story. Look at the spread of sessions at each level:
- The floor rose fastest. The best session gained 0.75 points per shot from the first plateau to the third. The worst gained 2.0.
- The waves got smaller. The session-to-session swing dropped by almost half. Consistency improved even while the average sat still.
- A bad session is part of the plateau. The low points sit right next to good ones, week after week, and they never set the trend.
- The bad days carried the signal. The clearest early sign of improvement was the worst sessions getting better. A history with the bad days left out would have hidden exactly that, which is why a report needs every session, not a selection.
The hold moved the same way
Each dot is one session's median hold: how far the aim point wandered in the last second before each shot. Lower is steadier. The line is the monthly median.
- The hold sat at about 2.3 MOA for ten months, then dropped to 1.7 in one step, then kept easing to about 1.5.
- After each step it didn't fall back. Each new level became the starting point for the next stretch of work.
Trying something new on a plateau
During the second plateau the shooter started coming onto the target a different way, down from above, alternating with settling first. These are every record shot of one session in each style, over the last 3 seconds. Colours follow SCATT: green from 3 s to 1 s before the shot, yellow from 1 s to ¼ s, blue for the last quarter second, red for the follow-through, and a grey dot at the shot. Up is high.
3 s to 1 s
1 s to ¼ s
last ¼ s
follow-through
- From above (33 sessions since July): the rifle comes down onto the target from 6–15 MOA high, and the shot goes about 5 s after the rifle comes up. 9.19 points per shot.
- Settled first (33 sessions): the rifle settles in the middle before the shot, about 7 s after it comes up. The hold looks steadier (1.45 MOA against 1.65), and it scores 9.24 per shot.
- The experiment cost nothing, and the second step came while the shooter was trying it. Without the traces, an approach from above is easy to mistake for a fault.
What gets measured
- Levels and steps
- Where the running average changed level, how long each plateau lasted, and what else changed at each step: equipment, practice volume, approach.
- Floor and spread
- The best and worst sessions at each level, and how much sessions swing from one to the next.
- Hold
- How far the aim point wanders from its own average over the last second before the shot (SD radius).
- Takedowns
- Approaches of at least 1 s continuously in the 8 ring that ended without a shot.
- Approach style
- Where the rifle comes from in the last 3 seconds, how long it takes, and what each style scores.
- Points per shot
- The SCATT app's session score divided by shots. The climb in spring 2025 is partly an off-centre zero being corrected, so the plateaus start from July 2025.
Get a report on your own shooting
If you train with SCATT, your files already hold all of this. Send them and Conrad Young will put together a report like this one, on your own sessions. On a plateau, it can show you the progress the score doesn't.
- In the SCATT app, export your sessions. You get a
.scatt-expert or .scatt-basic file. The more history it covers, the more the trends show; a whole history is fine, even hundreds of MB. Select all your sessions rather than picking and choosing: it's the easiest thing to do, and the best. Don't leave out the days you think went badly. Bad days often show progress first: in the plateaus-and-steps report, the worst sessions improved long before the average did. More data matters more, and the analysis finds the trends and sets aside sessions that are outliers.
- Upload it at readyonthefiringline.us/drop. No account needed, and your file is stored encrypted.
- In the form, add your email and a line about what you'd like to know: a slump, a position, a change you made.
Standing, sitting and prone all work.